I became aware of the rudiments of this story during the 1970s and 1980s in my various associations with the former Seamen’s Union of Australia (which amalgamated with the Waterside Workers' Federation in 1993 to form the Maritime Union of Australia) ,
and the now defunct Communist Party of Australia .
It was in these environments I first heard about, and met former members of, a strange
Pacific War outfit and its links with Sydney (Australia), the US Army Small Ships Section. The legacy and memory of this outfit remained on the Sydney waterfront
as part of a cultural memory, while forgotten or ignored elsewhere. Indeed the rallying point and meeting place for survivors of this outfit was, for a long time, a seafarers’ mission
in the Sydney maritime precinct.
Life and work intervened and I was not able to follow the story up. However in 2009 at a seafarer’s funeral, I personally held and examined the American passport of (Captain)Sheridan Fahnestock, American adventurer, amateur anthropologist, that had enabled him to travel to Australia in 1942 and open many doors. It was authorised by US
Secretary for State Cordell Hull , and Fahnestock was described as being on ‘special duties’. I resumed investigating......
In a sense this piece is not radical history, but it is an account of people who have, by and large, been written out of history, and it is an account of Australian warfare that does not easily mesh with traditional accounts of Australia at war. And it is an account of ordinary civilians caught up in the front lines of war, and their subsequent relegation to obscurity by authorities. For those interested in this story, some of my sources are evident in this account; the best starting place otherwise is the splendid Australian online site dedicated to the outfit, the US Army Small Ships Association Incorporated. This should be backed up by reference to the trove of The Fahnestock South Sea Collection held by The American Folklife Center (US Library of Congress).
Life and work intervened and I was not able to follow the story up. However in 2009 at a seafarer’s funeral, I personally held and examined the American passport of (Captain)
In a sense this piece is not radical history, but it is an account of people who have, by and large, been written out of history, and it is an account of Australian warfare that does not easily mesh with traditional accounts of Australia at war. And it is an account of ordinary civilians caught up in the front lines of war, and their subsequent relegation to obscurity by authorities. For those interested in this story, some of my sources are evident in this account; the best starting place otherwise is the splendid Australian online site dedicated to the outfit, the US Army Small Ships Association Incorporated. This should be backed up by reference to the trove of The Fahnestock South Sea Collection held by The American Folklife Center (US Library of Congress).
ANTHROPOLOGISTS, SPOOKS, AND THE BOYS WHO
WENT TO WAR
by
Rowan Cahill
They are old men now, the youngest in his
80s; at most some 200 or so of them remain. In the grim days of the war in the
Pacific when Australia faced the relentless drive southwards by Japanese armed
forces, they were recruited to the Allied war effort in Sydney, some as young
as 15 years of age, and sailed to war in the waters of New Guinea, and beyond,
some to die, serving on Australian vessels, but under the American flag and the
command of the US Army.
These veterans, all that remain of some
3000 who served, do not easily mesh with masculinist renderings of Anzac
mythology/military lore; the professional military history industry has largely
bypassed them. Some of them were boys, not metaphorically as beloved by
military cliché peddlers, but chronologically. Some of their comrades were
older, the oldest in his 70s; at least one father and son team served, the
father was just on 60, his son 16 and a half; some others who served only had
one arm, at least one only had one leg. And their American leadership mainly
comprised amateur soldiers.
Today the surviving Australian veterans
remain in touch with each other, supporting each other where possible,
attending the relentless parade of funerals, and campaigning and lobbying to keep
alive their contributions to the Pacific war effort. It was not until 2009 that
the Australian government recognised their eligibility for an Australian service award, and only then after extensive campaigning over decades by
survivors. Their largely forgotten story begins in New York during
the 1930s….
ADVENTURING AND ANTHROPOLOGY: Bruce Fahnestock (1911-1942) and his
brother Sheridan (1912-1965) made three voyages in the waters of the South Pacific
and Southeast Asia between 1934 and 1941. Members of a wealthy New York family,
the brothers learned to sail during childhood and youth on Long Island Sound.
Two of the voyages (1934-1937; 1940) were in large luxury sailing vessels they
owned; the third (1941) was in a chartered vessel.
While America
struggled its way out of the Depression and as Europe headed for war, the
Fahnestock brothers used family money and patronage to voyage, write about
their travels, broadcast, lecture, and engage in scientific, cartographic and
oceanographic work. They collected Pacific flora and fauna specimens for the American Museum of
Natural History (New York ) and the Tulsa (Oklahoma ) Zoo, recorded birdcalls and indigenous music, and pursued their
own anthropological investigations.
Mounted as ‘expeditions’, the voyages
were widely publicised. The brothers were well connected socially, and were
close to the family of US President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who gave their
second voyage his official blessing, along with those of New York Governor
Lehmen and Mayor La Guardia. The brothers made good copy, and had considerable
literary, journalistic, and media skills; post-World War 11 Sheridan became a
newspaper proprietor in Southern Maryland .
For much of their voyaging the brothers
were accompanied by their recently widowed mother, Mary Fahnestock, herself a
media friendly personality, adventurous, independent. A noted philanthropist,
with a particular interest in music, Mary was an inveterate traveller, and had
high profiles in the social circles of New York and Paris; her account of her
voyaging, I Ran Away to Sea at Fifty (1939), was a best-seller, as was
her sons’ account of their first voyage, Stars to Windward (1938).
The Fahnestock brothers and crew of Director 11 |
A focus of the second and third
expeditions was the recording of indigenous music. Collectively they documented music and dance
from American Samoa , Fiji , the Marquesas Islands , Tahiti , the Society Islands , Bali , Java, Madura, the Kangean islands, and New Caledonia .
Intellectually the brothers were ahead of their times in many respects; they
believed the indigenous cultures of Oceania and Southeast Asia had their own integrity. While remote pockets of these cultures had
survived colonialism, they were now threatened by mass western culture and the
burgeoning tourist industry. The Fahnestock mission was to try to document and
save what remained before it was destroyed. Also, through their understanding
of the indigenous music they experienced, the brothers were beginning to
hypothesise that cultural links, based on past migrations, existed between the
cultures of Asia and the Pacific.
In a wistful, romanticised, article in Harpers
(January 1941), the brothers wrote of one Pacific island culture they had
visited. Effectively cut off from French colonial control by the war in Europe , and much to the delight
of the Fahnestocks, the island was experiencing the rebirth and resurgence of
indigenous skills and culture. “We’ve found a spot on earth”, they wrote, “to
which the war has bought happiness”. It was a happiness the brothers were not
to share.
A POLITICAL IMPERATIVE: In 1937 the Fahnestock mission developed
a political imperative. The first voyage terminated in the Philippines due to crew illness and the consequent sale of the expedition
vessel. The brothers subsequently travelled to China and
witnessed the Japanese invasion; in Beijing Sheridan was mauled by Japanese
soldiery when he attempted to photograph troops. The brothers began to report
the war for the American press. Their third voyage, to the Netherlands East
Indies in 1941, yielded high quality recordings of rare Indonesian musical
performances; but the brothers and their crew also engaged in covert
intelligence gathering work, continuing a US
practice developed during World War 1 when anthropologists had engaged in
military and naval intelligence work in Mexico
and Central America .
While America
was not yet at war with either Germany
or Japan , at the behest of family friend President Roosevelt the Fahnestocks
were to report on the preparedness of the Dutch
East Indies to deal with future Japanese
invasion. In early 1942, with America
now actually at war with Japan ,
the Fahnestock brothers and a group of their former voyaging compatriots
returned to Australia . They were now officers in the US Army: Sheridan was a
Captain (later Colonel); Bruce, a Ist Lieutenant; the other crew members, 2nd
Lieutenants. Sheridan carried a passport bearing the authorisation of Secretary of State
Cordell Hull, describing him as being on ‘Special Duties for the US State
Department’.
American forces in the Philippines had surrendered to Japan ;
their commander, General Macarthur, had avoided capture by dramatically
escaping to Australia from where he was now organising the long fight back, beginning
with combating advancing Japanese forces in New Guinea . Stateside, and in the Pacific, American naval and military
hierarchies were embroiled in frustrating their own war efforts as rival egos
and strategies conflicted. On the ground in New Guinea , the American army needed maritime logistical support.
THE SMALL BOAT SOLUTION: The Fahnestock team was part of the
solution; it was experienced in small boat operation, particularly with regard
to working and navigating in shallow and island waters. Its mission was to
improvise the necessary stopgap maritime capability to ferry troops, ordinance,
and supplies to the war zones, and to evacuate the sick and wounded. The
Fahnestock brothers brought significant leadership and organisational skills to
their task, along with intellect, charm, doggedness, and imaginations not
institutionally proscribed.
Assisted by the Australian Government the
Fahnestock team created the US Army Small Ships Section in 1942, operating out
of the Grace Building in Sydney on the corner of York and King Streets. While it was an American
outfit with American leaders, the Section depended on Australian vessels,
resources, and manpower until late 1943, early 1944, when American crews and
purpose built vessels became available. A fleet of shallow draft vessels
capable of working in reef-strewn waters inaccessible to larger vessels was
variously cobbled together by requisition, purchase or hire. It comprised
fishing trawlers, small cargo carrying sailing ships from the coastal and
island trades, luggers, eight plywood landing craft, and some larger vessels,
mainly of WW1 vintage. At the outset the Fahnestock’s led from the front,
Sheridan in command of one of the vulnerable landing craft; brother Bruce was
killed in October 1942 off the New Guinea coast when his landing craft was
mistaken for an enemy vessel by an American bomber; also killed in this
incident was New York Times war correspondent Byron Darnton
(1897-1942).
The Section hired shipwrights, labourers,
boat builders, carpenters, mechanics, to service and repair the vessels and to
build slipways, jetties, wharves in Australia
and New Guinea . Walsh Bay , Sydney , was where the fleet was fitted out, provisioned, and in cases
armed with light machine guns or World War 1 weaponry. Australian manpower
authorities enabled the recruitment of Australian crews to work the fleet: any
males too old, too young, or considered medically unfit for service in Australia ’s
armed forces. In 1943, to make up for losses due to enemy action, a training
school was established in Walsh Bay and 163 boys between the ages of 15-16
years old successfully trained for war; a month’s training in basic seamanship,
navigation, and some weapons use.
Work in the Section was dangerous, often
taking place at night to avoid Japanese sea and floatplane patrols, and enemy
shore fire. Service was based on American civilian contracts of 6 and 12 months
duration. There was no uniform, but American work-clothes were provided; no
repatriation benefits or on-going veterans’ entitlements were involved;
Australian income tax was paid. Before the Section was disbanded in 1947, Small
Ships’ units saw active service supporting American, and Australian, forces in
New Guinea, the Philippines, Chosen (Korea), and Japan. At wars’ end the
American leadership variously returned home to civilian life; the Australians
who had served went unrecognised, their service ignored by US authorities who
argued they were Australians, and by Australian authorities who argued they
were an American responsibility.
AFTERMATH: Decades of lobbying and campaigning by
Small Ships’ veterans partially redressed the situation. In 1986 along with
Australian merchant marine veterans of World War 11, the Small Ships’ veterans
became eligible for benefits under the Veterans’ Affairs system, but unlike
merchant mariners, not to any Australian service award. In 2008 Australia ’s
Minister for Veterans’ Affairs unveiled a Sydney harbourside
memorial to the boys who graduated from the Walsh Bay training
school. In 2009 the US Congress approved the award of the US Army Sea Duty
Ribbon to the Australian Small Ships’ crews. In 2009 the Australian government recognised their eligibility for the War Medal.
Small Ships' plaque, Grace Hotel, Sydney. |
Rowan Cahill,
University of Wollongong,
30 July 2012.